From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754756AbcJUAVn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:21:43 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37846 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752778AbcJUAVn (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:21:43 -0400
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 02:21:35 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Weekly News <lwn@lwn.net>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/52] New Tool: perf c2c
Message-ID: <20161021002135.GC23970@krava>
References: <1476975876-2522-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
 <20161020180224.23b087c217663cd262ddc873@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161020180224.23b087c217663cd262ddc873@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:21:42 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 06:02:24PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:03:44 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git tags/perf-c2c-for-mingo-20161020
> 
> Running this as a normal user may not be the best thing to do, but I'm
> pretty sure the TUI c2c report shouldn't sigsegv:

right, it also helps to have the store event..

we added the 'e' to be able to change events properties (like ldlat,modifiers..)

it wasn't meant to be to specify just single event, because
the c2c report expects both events.. maybe we should limit that
or at least warn

thanks,
jirka