From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S938785AbcJXJmj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:42:39 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37576 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1755895AbcJXJmg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:42:36 -0400
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:42:31 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Weekly News <lwn@lwn.net>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/52] New Tool: perf c2c
Message-ID: <20161024094231.GA23322@krava>
References: <1476975876-2522-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
 <20161022082806.GA4526@gmail.com>
 <20161023110542.GA15618@krava>
 <20161024092327.GA15012@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161024092327.GA15012@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:42:35 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:23:28AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > > If I do 'perf report' I get two events:
> > > 
> > >  Available samples
> > >  24K cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
> > >  45K cpu/mem-stores/P
> > > 
> > > and both have some real data.
> > > 
> > > What am I missing?
> > 
> > hm, most likely you did not generate any remote HITMs.. if it was on the laptop?
> 
> Yeah.
> 
> > you might get some results for local HITMs with -d option:
> > 
> >   $ perf c2c report -d lcl
> > 
> > the default display/filter is for Remote HITMs.. perhaps we could be
> > smart enough and switch to local when we found no data for remote
> 
> Yeah, this did the trick.
> 
> Could we please make sure there's always actionable output by the tool? I.e. it 
> should either clearly refuse to work (due to lack of hw), or it should produce 
> something meaningful.

ok, will do

thanks,
jirka