From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, feng.wu@intel.com, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: avoid atomic operations on APICv vmentry
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:53:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161026195344.GB4212@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476469291-5039-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
2016-10-14 20:21+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On some benchmarks (e.g. netperf with ioeventfd disabled), APICv
> posted interrupts turn out to be slower than interrupt injection via
> KVM_REQ_EVENT.
>
> This patch optimizes a bit the IRR update, avoiding expensive atomic
> operations in the common case where PI.ON=0 at vmentry or the PIR vector
> is mostly zero. This saves at least 20 cycles (1%) per vmexit, as
> measured by kvm-unit-tests' inl_from_qemu test (20 runs):
>
> | enable_apicv=1 | enable_apicv=0
> | mean stdev | mean stdev
> ----------|-----------------|------------------
> before | 5826 32.65 | 5765 47.09
> after | 5809 43.42 | 5777 77.02
>
> Of course, any change in the right column is just placebo effect. :)
> The savings are bigger if interrupts are frequent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -521,6 +521,12 @@ static inline void pi_set_sn(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
> (unsigned long *)&pi_desc->control);
> }
>
> +static inline void pi_clear_on(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
> +{
> + clear_bit(POSTED_INTR_ON,
> + (unsigned long *)&pi_desc->control);
^^
bad whitespace.
> +}
We should add an explicit smp_mb__after_atomic() for extra correctness,
because clear_bit() does not guarantee a memory barrier and we must make
sure that pir reads can't be reordered before it.
x86 clear_bit() currently uses locked instruction, though.
> +
> static inline int pi_test_on(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
> {
> return test_bit(POSTED_INTR_ON,
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-14 18:21 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: cleanup and minimal speedup for APICv Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: avoid atomic operations on APICv vmentry Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 18:50 ` Nadav Amit
2016-10-14 18:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 19:44 ` Nadav Amit
2016-10-15 7:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-16 2:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-19 11:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-10-26 21:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-16 3:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-17 11:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-26 19:53 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2016-10-26 21:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-27 16:44 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-27 16:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-27 17:06 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-28 9:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-28 22:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86: do not scan IRR twice " Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-18 6:04 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-10-26 19:59 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-03 13:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-03 13:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-03 16:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-03 15:03 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-03 16:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-03 18:07 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-03 18:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-03 18:29 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-03 20:16 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-04 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv interrupt injection Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-26 20:05 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: remove unnecessary sync_pir_to_irr Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-26 20:28 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: vmx: clear pending interrupts on KVM_SET_LAPIC Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-26 20:08 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-26 21:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: cleanup and minimal speedup for APICv Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161026195344.GB4212@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).