From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S943349AbcJ0PUS (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:20:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:35294 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936359AbcJ0PUP (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:20:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:59:04 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , Jan Kara , Hugh Dickins , Dave Hansen , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: add locked parameter to get_user_pages_remote() Message-ID: <20161027105903.GI6454@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20161027095141.2569-1-lstoakes@gmail.com> <20161027095141.2569-2-lstoakes@gmail.com> <20161027105527.GG6454@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161027105527.GG6454@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 27-10-16 12:55:27, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 27-10-16 10:51:40, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > This patch adds a int *locked parameter to get_user_pages_remote() to allow > > VM_FAULT_RETRY faulting behaviour similar to get_user_pages_[un]locked(). > > > > Taking into account the previous adjustments to get_user_pages*() functions > > allowing for the passing of gup_flags, we are now in a position where > > __get_user_pages_unlocked() need only be exported for his ability to allow > > VM_FAULT_RETRY behaviour, this adjustment allows us to subsequently unexport > > __get_user_pages_unlocked() as well as allowing for future flexibility in the > > use of get_user_pages_remote(). > > I would also add that this shouldn't introduce any functional change. Forgot to mention that this also opens doors to change other g_u_p_r callers to allow FAULT_RETRY logic. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs