From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parport@lists.infradead.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppdev: fix double-free of pp->pdev->name
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:12:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161030221233.GA24750@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161030180036.GC2558@pc.thejh.net>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 07:00:36PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:24:27PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 October 2016 09:14 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
> > >free_pardevice() is called by parport_unregister_device() and already frees
> > >pp->pdev->name, don't try to do it again.
> > >
> > >This bug causes kernel crashes.
> > >
> > >I found and verified this with KASAN and some added pr_emerg()s:
> > >
> > >[ 60.316568] pp_release: pp->pdev->name == ffff88039cb264c0
> > >[ 60.316692] free_pardevice: freeing par_dev->name at ffff88039cb264c0
> > >[ 60.316706] pp_release: kfree(ffff88039cb264c0)
> > >[ 60.316714] ==========================================================
> > >[ 60.316722] BUG: Double free or freeing an invalid pointer
> > >[ 60.316731] Unexpected shadow byte: 0xFB
> > >[ 60.316801] Object at ffff88039cb264c0, in cache kmalloc-32 size: 32
> > >[ 60.316813] Allocated:
> > >[ 60.316824] PID = 1695
> > >[ 60.316869] Freed:
> > >[ 60.316880] PID = 1695
> > >[ 60.316935] ==========================================================
> > >
> > >CCing Andy Lutomirski because I think this is what broke vmapped stacks
> > >for me - after applying this patch, vmapped stacks worked for me.
> > >Previously, I got oopses (and lockups) caused by area->pages[0] being
> > >0x400000000 in __vunmap(), with area->pages being allocated in the kmalloc
> > >area.
> >
> > I think the above should not be a part of the commit message.
>
> Ah, yes.
>
> @maintainers: Feel free to remove that from the commit message. Or should I
> resend?
Please resend, never make a maintainer hand-edit a patch changelog :)
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-30 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-30 15:44 [PATCH] ppdev: fix double-free of pp->pdev->name Jann Horn
2016-10-30 16:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-30 16:47 ` Jann Horn
2016-10-30 17:54 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2016-10-30 18:00 ` Jann Horn
2016-10-30 22:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161030221233.GA24750@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parport@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox