From: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] fork: make whole stack_canary random
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:29:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161031162918.GA2994@pc.thejh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5j+Hz=AmmTAh3+QOv1wTG3HA60LPK0Dq6F8uybNQ5e+sHw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1188 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:04:02AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> wrote:
> > On machines with sizeof(unsigned long)==8, this ensures that the more
> > significant 32 bits of stack_canary are random, too.
> > stack_canary is defined as unsigned long, all the architectures with stack
> > protector support already pick the stack_canary of init as a random
> > unsigned long, and get_random_long() should be as fast as get_random_int(),
> > so there seems to be no good reason against this.
> >
> > This should help if someone tries to guess a stack canary with brute force.
> >
> > (This change has been made in PaX already, with a different RNG.)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
> (A separate change might be to make sure that the leading byte is
> zeroed. Entropy of the value, I think, is less important than blocking
> canary exposures from unbounded str* functions. Brute forcing kernel
> stack canaries isn't like it bruting them in userspace...)
Yeah, makes sense. Especially on 64bit, 56 bits of entropy ought to be
enough anyway.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-31 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-31 14:04 [PATCH] fork: make whole stack_canary random Jann Horn
2016-10-31 16:04 ` Kees Cook
2016-10-31 16:29 ` Jann Horn [this message]
2016-10-31 20:45 ` [kernel-hardening] " Florian Weimer
2016-10-31 20:55 ` Jann Horn
2016-10-31 20:56 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 21:01 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 21:10 ` Florian Weimer
2016-10-31 21:21 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 21:38 ` Florian Weimer
2016-10-31 22:02 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 22:11 ` Florian Weimer
2016-10-31 21:22 ` Jann Horn
2016-10-31 21:26 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 21:26 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161031162918.GA2994@pc.thejh.net \
--to=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox