From: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] fork: make whole stack_canary random
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:55:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161031205526.GA3286@pc.thejh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mvhks0vs.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2047 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jann Horn:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:04:02AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> wrote:
> >> > On machines with sizeof(unsigned long)==8, this ensures that the more
> >> > significant 32 bits of stack_canary are random, too.
> >> > stack_canary is defined as unsigned long, all the architectures with stack
> >> > protector support already pick the stack_canary of init as a random
> >> > unsigned long, and get_random_long() should be as fast as get_random_int(),
> >> > so there seems to be no good reason against this.
> >> >
> >> > This should help if someone tries to guess a stack canary with brute force.
> >> >
> >> > (This change has been made in PaX already, with a different RNG.)
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >>
> >> (A separate change might be to make sure that the leading byte is
> >> zeroed. Entropy of the value, I think, is less important than blocking
> >> canary exposures from unbounded str* functions. Brute forcing kernel
> >> stack canaries isn't like it bruting them in userspace...)
> >
> > Yeah, makes sense. Especially on 64bit, 56 bits of entropy ought to be
> > enough anyway.
>
> So you two approve of the way glibc does this currently? (See the
> other thread.)
Well... not really with a 32-bit canary. 2^23 crashes to defeat a
mitigation is not so much, even over the network. With a 64-bit canary,
losing the 8 bits would be no problem at all IMO.
So I guess I should revise what I said: I think the nullbyte thing is
fine for 64-bit canaries, but not for 32-bit ones.
> I was under the impression that the kernel performs far less
> null-terminated string processing the average user space application,
> especially on the stack.
Yes, that's true - the kernel allocates even small-ish temporary string
buffers with kmalloc() to reduce stack usage.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-31 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-31 14:04 [PATCH] fork: make whole stack_canary random Jann Horn
2016-10-31 16:04 ` Kees Cook
2016-10-31 16:29 ` [kernel-hardening] " Jann Horn
2016-10-31 20:45 ` Florian Weimer
2016-10-31 20:55 ` Jann Horn [this message]
2016-10-31 20:56 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 21:01 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 21:10 ` Florian Weimer
2016-10-31 21:21 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 21:38 ` Florian Weimer
2016-10-31 22:02 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 22:11 ` Florian Weimer
2016-10-31 21:22 ` Jann Horn
2016-10-31 21:26 ` Daniel Micay
2016-10-31 21:26 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161031205526.GA3286@pc.thejh.net \
--to=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox