From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760049AbcKCSlU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:41:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:34608 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751648AbcKCSlS (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:41:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:41:12 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Jaehoon Chung Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max" Message-ID: <20161103184112.GB11071@kozik-lap> References: <20161103062135.10697-1-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property. > It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of > "clock-freq-min-max". > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum frequency). Is that correct? Best regards, Krzysztof