From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:07:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161107140746.GA20626@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161107092031.alxfkr6rpctodbdk@pd.tnic>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:31:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > cpu_llc_id (Last Level Cache ID) derivation on AMD Fam17h has an
> > > underflow bug when extracting the socket_id value. It starts from 0
>
> How's this...
>
> > > so subtracting 1 from it will result in an invalid value. This breaks
> > > scheduling topology later on since the cpu_llc_id will be incorrect.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ... here?
>
> > Same question as for the previous patch: what are the effects of the bug:
>
> See above.
There's many ways the scheduling topology can 'break', resulting in different
effects:
- scheduling domains might be mixed up to the extent of crashing the bootup
- some cores might be missing altogether, reducing available CPUs in essence
- cache domains might be seriously mixed up, resulting in serious drop in
performance.
- or domains might be partitioned 'wrong' but not catastrophically
wrong, resulting in a minor performance drop (if at all)
... do we know which of these occurs in this situation?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-07 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 16:51 [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-01 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/AMD: Group cpu_llc_id assignment by topology feature and family Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-02 20:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-07 9:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-02 20:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-07 9:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07 14:07 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-11-07 15:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-08 8:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-08 11:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-08 15:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10 8:00 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86/cpu/AMD: Clean up cpu_llc_id assignment per topology feature tip-bot for Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-09 16:13 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/cpu/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems tip-bot for Yazen Ghannam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161107140746.GA20626@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).