public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: Add mutex protection in brightness_show()
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 13:38:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161109123800.GB3488@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478245962-15706-1-git-send-email-j.anaszewski@samsung.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 658 bytes --]

Hi!

> Initially the claim about no need for lock in brightness_show()
> was valid as the function was just returning unchanged
> LED brightness. After the addition of led_update_brightness() this

The claim was probably wrong from the day one, unless brightness is of
type "atomic_t".

             /* Ensures consistent access to the LED Flash Class device */
	        struct mutex            led_access;
		};

This should really list fields that are protected by led_access.

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-09 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-04  7:52 [PATCH] leds: Add mutex protection in brightness_show() Jacek Anaszewski
2016-11-04 11:53 ` Hans de Goede
2016-11-04 16:06   ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-11-04 16:46     ` Hans de Goede
2016-11-06 14:52       ` Hans de Goede
2016-11-07  9:11         ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-11-09 12:37           ` Pavel Machek
2016-11-09 20:26             ` Pavel Machek
2016-11-09 21:23               ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-11-09 12:38 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2016-11-09 21:23   ` Jacek Anaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161109123800.GB3488@amd \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox