From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: cpuidle: assign enter_freeze to same as enter callback function
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:39:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161109183925.GA19565@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478713410-10727-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:43:30PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> enter_freeze() callback is expected atleast to do the same as enter()
> but it has to guarantee that interrupts aren't enabled at any point
> in its execution, as the tick is frozen.
>
> CPUs execute ->enter_freeze with the local tick or entire timekeeping
> suspended, so it must not re-enable interrupts at any point (even
> temporarily) or attempt to change states of clock event devices.
>
> It will be called when the system goes to suspend-to-idle and will
> reduce power usage because CPUs won't be awaken for unnecessary IRQs
> (i.e. woken up only on IRQs from "wakeup sources")
>
> Since for all the states that have CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag set,
> local tick is stopped, we can reuse the same code for both the enter()
> and enter_freeze() callbacks. Only "coupled" cpuidle mechanism enables
> interrupts and doing that with timekeeping suspended is generally not
> safe. Since this generic DT based idle driver doesn't support "coupled"
> states, it is safe to assume that the interrupts are not re-enabled.
>
> This patch assign enter_freeze to same as enter callback function which
> helps to save power without any intermittent spurious wakeups from
> suspend-to-idle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c b/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c
> index a5c111b67f37..5a087d108475 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c
> @@ -79,8 +79,17 @@ static int init_state_node(struct cpuidle_state *idle_state,
> desc = state_node->name;
>
> idle_state->flags = 0;
> - if (of_property_read_bool(state_node, "local-timer-stop"))
> + if (of_property_read_bool(state_node, "local-timer-stop")) {
> idle_state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
> + /*
> + * CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP guarantees that the local tick is
> + * stopped and since this is not a "coupled" state interrupts
> + * won't be enabled when it exits allowing the tick to be
> + * frozen safely. So enter() can be also enter_freeze()
> + * callback.
> + */
I do not think that represents a guarantee for enter_freeze() to be
functional, we can initialize enter_freeze() with a function that
does _not_ enable IRQs while executing, it has not much to do with
the local timer losing HW state.
I would just init the enter_freeze() pointer and be done with that,
adding code to check whether the idle back-end enables IRQs when it
enters idle is a major PITA that really is not worth the hassle and
apart from coupled C-states (which we do not support in DT as you said)
I can't find another example (and on top of that it is not even
something we can solve through DT since it is not a property of the idle
state but more related to its kernel implementation).
If we wanted to do it _properly_ we have to add an arch hook to check
if the given idle state enter function back-end, ie cpu_ops on ARM64 or
or cpuidle_ops on ARM, enables IRQs while executing, I would honestly
avoid it but comments are nonetheless welcome.
Thanks for putting it together,
Lorenzo
> + idle_state->enter_freeze = match_id->data;
> + }
> /*
> * TODO:
> * replace with kstrdup and pointer assignment when name
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-09 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-09 17:43 [PATCH] drivers: cpuidle: assign enter_freeze to same as enter callback function Sudeep Holla
2016-11-09 18:39 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-11-09 18:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-11-10 10:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-11-10 10:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-11-10 14:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Sudeep Holla
2016-11-10 18:18 ` Andy Gross
2016-11-15 14:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-11-24 1:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161109183925.GA19565@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox