linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	nm@ti.com, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	d-gerlach@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:13:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161115021302.GR5177@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115015952.steomn4azdl5iv6z@rob-hp-laptop>

On 11/14, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 08:41:20AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 10-11-16, 14:51, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > 
> > > No. The supply names (and also clock names/index) should be left
> > > up to the consumer of the OPP table. We don't want to encode any
> > > sort of details like this between the OPP table and the consumer
> > > of it in DT because then it seriously couples the OPP table to
> > > the consumer device. "The binding" in this case that needs to be
> > > updated is the consumer binding, to indicate that it correlated
> > > foo-supply and bar-supply to index 0 and 1 of the OPP table
> > > voltages.
> > 
> > Are you saying that we shall have a property like this then?
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
> > index ee91cbdd95ee..733946df2fb8 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
> > @@ -389,7 +389,10 @@ Example 4: Handling multiple regulators
> >                         compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> >                         ...
> >  
> > -                       cpu-supply = <&cpu_supply0>, <&cpu_supply1>, <&cpu_supply2>;
> > +                       vcc0-supply = <&cpu_supply0>;
> > +                       vcc1-supply = <&cpu_supply1>;
> > +                       vcc2-supply = <&cpu_supply2>;
> > +                       opp-supply-names = "vcc0", "vcc1", "vcc2";
> 
> Uh, no. You already have the names in the *-supply properties. Yes, they 
> are a PIA to retrieve compared to a *-names property, but that is the 
> nature of this style of binding.
> 

I think the problem is that Viresh wants the binding to be "self
describing" so that the OPP can be used without a driver knowing
that a supply corresponds to a particular column in the voltage
table. I don't understand that though. Can't we set the supply
names from C code somewhere based on the consumer of the OPPs?
Similar to how we pick the different tables based on fuses?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-15  2:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-26  6:32 [PATCH V3 0/9] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:32 ` [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device Viresh Kumar
2016-11-09 14:58   ` Mark Brown
2016-11-10  4:04     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10 16:36       ` Mark Brown
2016-11-10 18:09         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10 22:51           ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-11  3:11             ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-15  1:59               ` Rob Herring
2016-11-15  2:13                 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-11-15  3:31                   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-15 18:56                     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-15 22:11                       ` Dave Gerlach
2016-11-16  3:18                         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-16  3:08                       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:32 ` [PATCH V3 2/9] PM / OPP: Don't use OPP structure outside of rcu protected section Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:32 ` [PATCH V3 3/9] PM / OPP: Manage supply's voltage/current in a separate structure Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:32 ` [PATCH V3 4/9] PM / OPP: Pass struct dev_pm_opp_supply to _set_opp_voltage() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 5/9] PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 6/9] PM / OPP: Separate out _generic_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 7/9] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom set_opp() callbacks Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 8/9] PM / OPP: Don't WARN on multiple calls to dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-26  6:33 ` [PATCH V3 9/9] PM / OPP: Don't assume platform doesn't have regulators Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10  1:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-10  5:16     ` [PATCH V4 " Viresh Kumar
2016-11-02  4:51 ` [PATCH V3 0/9] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10  1:19   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-10  4:11     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-15 22:10 ` [TEST PATCH] WIP: Test OPP multi regulator support with ti-opp-domain driver Dave Gerlach
2016-11-16  1:38   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-16  2:01   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-16  3:27   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-18  3:06 ` [PATCH V3 0/9] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-11-18 10:43   ` Mark Brown
2016-11-22  3:49     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-22 18:41       ` Mark Brown
2016-11-23  3:46         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-23 12:29           ` Mark Brown
2016-11-24  5:07             ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-24 10:19               ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161115021302.GR5177@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).