Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mtd: nand: raw: make BBT code more generic

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>]

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:43:58 +0800
Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Boris,
> 
> I found a bug during my review. Please see below.
> 
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > BBT support is currently tightly tied to raw NAND, though this is the kind
> > of code we could share across all NAND based devices, no matter what
> > physical interface is to communicate with the NAND chip.
> >
> > Make BBT code interface agnostic by replacing all occurrence of
> > struct nand_chip by struct nand_device, and move functions that are
> > specific to raw NANDs to drivers/mtd/nand/rawnand/nand_base.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c |  78 ++++-
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_bbt.c  | 609 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  include/linux/mtd/nand.h         |   8 +
> >  include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h      |   4 -
> >  4 files changed, 361 insertions(+), 338 deletions(-)
> >  
> [...]
> >  /**
> >   * write_bbt - [GENERIC] (Re)write the bad block table
> > - * @mtd: MTD device structure
> > + * @this: NAND device
> >   * @buf: temporary buffer
> >   * @td: descriptor for the bad block table
> >   * @md: descriptor for the bad block table mirror
> > @@ -708,11 +707,11 @@ static void mark_bbt_block_bad(struct nand_chip *this,
> >   *
> >   * (Re)write the bad block table.
> >   */
> > -static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
> > +static int write_bbt(struct nand_device *this, uint8_t *buf,
> >                      struct nand_bbt_descr *td, struct nand_bbt_descr *md,
> >                      int chipsel)
> >  {
> > -       struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nandc(mtd);
> > +       struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(this);
> >         struct erase_info einfo;
> >         int i, res, chip = 0;
> >         int bits, page, offs, numblocks, sft, sftmsk;
> > @@ -723,7 +722,7 @@ static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
> >         loff_t to;
> >         struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
> >
> > -       ops.ooblen = mtd->oobsize;
> > +       ops.ooblen = nand_per_page_oobsize(this);
> >         ops.ooboffs = 0;
> >         ops.datbuf = NULL;
> >         ops.mode = MTD_OPS_PLACE_OOB;
> > @@ -732,16 +731,16 @@ static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
> >                 rcode = 0xff;
> >         /* Write bad block table per chip rather than per device? */
> >         if (td->options & NAND_BBT_PERCHIP) {
> > -               numblocks = (int)(this->chipsize >> this->bbt_erase_shift);
> > +               numblocks = nand_eraseblocks_per_die(this);
> >                 /* Full device write or specific chip? */
> >                 if (chipsel == -1) {
> > -                       nrchips = this->numchips;
> > +                       nrchips = nand_ndies(this);
> >                 } else {
> >                         nrchips = chipsel + 1;
> >                         chip = chipsel;
> >                 }
> >         } else {
> > -               numblocks = (int)(mtd->size >> this->bbt_erase_shift);
> > +               numblocks = nand_neraseblocks(this);
> >                 nrchips = 1;
> >         }
> >
> > @@ -760,7 +759,7 @@ static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
> >                  * get_bbt_block() returns a block number, shift the value to
> >                  * get a page number.
> >                  */
> > -               page = block << (this->bbt_erase_shift - this->page_shift);
> > +               nand_eraseblock_to_page(this, block);  
> 
> Should be page = nand_eraseblock_to_page(this, block);
> 
> I will continue to review and test your patch. Hope give you feedback this week.

Cool. Thanks a lot!

> 
> Thanks,
> Peter Pan