From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752754AbcKRISA (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:18:00 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:34959 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752513AbcKRIR7 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:17:59 -0500
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:17:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: remove idle notifier
Message-ID: <20161118081755.GA4425@gmail.com>
References: <20161118062321.31569-1-lenb@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161118062321.31569-1-lenb@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:

> The return from idle path is latency sensitive,
> so the less code and fewer data accesses, the better.
> 
> Remove the un-maintained i7300_idle driver,
> the only user of the x86 idle-notifier,
> and then remove the notifier itself. 

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo