linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bin Gao <bin.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/tsc: set TSC_KNOWN_FREQ and TSC_RELIABLE flags on Intel Atom SoCs
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:21:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161118082103.GB4425@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479241644-234277-5-git-send-email-bin.gao@linux.intel.com>


* Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> TSC on Intel Atom SoCs capable of determining TSC frequency by MSR is
> reliable and the frequency is known (because it's provided by HW).
> On these platforms PIT/HPET is generally not available so
> calibration won't work at all and also TSC is the only reliable
> clocksource. So we set both X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ and
> X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE flags to make sure the calibration is
> skipped and no watchdog on TSC.
> +	/*
> +	 * TSC frequency determined by MSR is always considered "known"
> +	 * because it is reported by HW.
> +	 * Another fact is that on MSR capable platforms, PIT/HPET is
> +	 * generally not available so calibration won't work at all.
> +	 */
> +	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Unfortunately there is no a HW way to report TSC is reliable.
> +	 * We were told by silicon design team that TSC on Atom SoCs are
> +	 * always "reliable". TSC is also the only reliable clocksource
> +	 * on these SoCs (HPET is either not present or not functional)
> +	 * so marke TSC reliable to avoid watchdog on it.

minor nit:

 s/there is no a HW way/
   there is no HW way

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-18  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-15 20:27 [PATCH 0/4] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag and hardware related changes Bin Gao
2016-11-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/tsc: add X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ flag Bin Gao
2016-11-18 10:04   ` [tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Add " tip-bot for Bin Gao
2016-11-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/tsc: mark TSC frequency determined by CPUID as known Bin Gao
2016-11-18 10:05   ` [tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Mark " tip-bot for Bin Gao
2016-11-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/tsc: mark Intel ATOM_GOLDMONT TSC reliable Bin Gao
2016-11-18 10:05   ` [tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Mark " tip-bot for Bin Gao
2016-11-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/tsc: set TSC_KNOWN_FREQ and TSC_RELIABLE flags on Intel Atom SoCs Bin Gao
2016-11-18  8:21   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-11-18 10:06   ` [tip:x86/timers] x86/tsc: Set " tip-bot for Bin Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161118082103.GB4425@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bin.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=bin.gao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).