public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status [ver #2]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:10:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161123101050.GA2113@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31281.1479894780@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:53:00AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> wrote:
> > It just occurred to me that the boot_params struct is populated in
> > make_boot_params(), perhaps it makes sense to move this line there.
> > Otherwise LGTM.
> 
> Ummm...  Looking at arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S, make_boot_params() is
> only called if the stub is entered through efi_pe_entry, not if entered
> through efi64_stub_entry, whereas efi_main() is called in both cases.  I think
> entry through efi32_stub_entry may also skip make_boot_params().
> 
> The comment on make_boot_params() suggests that this function is only used if
> whoever booted the kernel didn't supply it.

Good point. :-) I didn't dig this deep, it was just something that
crossed my mind when skimming over the patch.

You're also right about the (efi_##f##_t *) addition in patch 2.

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-23 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-23  0:22 [PATCH 0/6] efi: Pass secure boot mode to kernel [ver #2] David Howells
2016-11-23  0:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services " David Howells
2016-11-23  0:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm/efi: " David Howells
2016-11-23  9:34   ` David Howells
2016-11-23 10:35     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-11-23 11:51       ` David Howells
2016-11-23 10:27   ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-23 11:46     ` David Howells
2016-11-23 13:38       ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-23  0:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] efi: Add SHIM and image security database GUID definitions " David Howells
2016-11-23  0:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] efi: Get the secure boot status " David Howells
2016-11-23  9:31   ` Lukas Wunner
2016-11-23  9:53     ` David Howells
2016-11-23 10:10       ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2016-11-23 10:47   ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-23 11:25     ` David Howells
2016-11-23 13:42       ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-23 14:13         ` David Howells
2016-11-23 14:24           ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-23 14:55             ` David Howells
2016-11-29 18:11               ` Matthew Garrett
2016-11-30 16:51     ` David Howells
2016-11-23  0:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] efi: Disable secure boot if shim is in insecure mode " David Howells
2016-11-23 13:38   ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-23  0:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] efi: Add EFI_SECURE_BOOT bit " David Howells
2016-11-23  9:27   ` Lukas Wunner
2016-11-23 10:07     ` David Howells
2016-11-23 10:09       ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161123101050.GA2113@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox