From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935306AbcKXIpK (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2016 03:45:10 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:37217 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933142AbcKXIpJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2016 03:45:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:48:09 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Mark Brown , Linux-ALSA , Simon , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Charles Keepax , Arnd Bergmann , anish kumar , Michael Trimarchi , Jacob Siverskog , "Damien.Horsley" , Jeremy McDermond , Bard Liao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: cq93vc: enable compiling on COMPILE_TEST Message-ID: <20161124084809.GT10134@dell.home> References: <878ttafb84.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <8760ndei6k.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87wpftcw2v.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87wpftcw2v.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Lee, Mark > > > > Current cq93vc sound codec indicates that it has > > > MFD_DAVINCI_VOICECODEC dependency, but it doesn't. > > > This means we can compile it from non DAVINCE environment > > > by COMPILE_TEST. > > > These patches solve this issue. > > > I tested this on ARCH=x86 + make allyesconfig, and > > > ARCH=ARM + shmobile_defconfig + COMPILE_TEST. > > > > > > Kuninori Morimoto (2): > > > mfd: davinci_voicecodec: tidyup header difinitions > > > ASoC: cq93vc: remove MFD_DAVINCI_VOICECODEC dependency for CQ0093VC > > > > I know [2/2] had Acked-by from Mark, and [1/2] was accepted by Lee. > > I could find [1/2] patch on linux-next tree today. > > But, I'm afraid I can't find [2/2] patch on linux-next. > > I mean, I (and Mark too?) thought Lee can handle [2/2] patch, > but it seems not (?). So, my question is who can handle it ? I didn't see anything build-time dependant. Unless I missed something? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog