From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752731AbcKYHZu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 25 Nov 2016 02:25:50 -0500
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:47671 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750995AbcKYHZl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 25 Nov 2016 02:25:41 -0500
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 08:25:38 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: mst@redhat.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: automatic IRQ affinity for virtio
Message-ID: <20161125072538.GA732@lst.de>
References: <1479379403-27880-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1479379403-27880-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Btw, what's the best way to get any response to this series?
But this and the predecessor seem to have completly fallen on deaf
ears.