From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: 4.8.8 kernel trigger OOM killer repeatedly when I have lots of RAM that should be free
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:23:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161128072315.GC14788@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161123063410.GB2864@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Marc, could you try this patch please? I think it should be pretty clear
it should help you but running it through your use case would be more
than welcome before I ask Greg to take this to the 4.8 stable tree.
Thanks!
On Wed 23-11-16 07:34:10, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> commit b2ccdcb731b666aa28f86483656c39c5e53828c7
> Author: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Date: Wed Nov 23 07:26:30 2016 +0100
>
> mm, oom: stop pre-mature high-order OOM killer invocations
>
> 31e49bfda184 ("mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more for
> !CONFIG_COMPACTION") was an attempt to reduce chances of pre-mature OOM
> killer invocation for high order requests. It seemed to work for most
> users just fine but it is far from bullet proof and obviously not
> sufficient for Marc who has reported pre-mature OOM killer invocations
> with 4.8 based kernels. 4.9 will all the compaction improvements seems
> to be behaving much better but that would be too intrusive to backport
> to 4.8 stable kernels. Instead this patch simply never declares OOM for
> !costly high order requests. We rely on order-0 requests to do that in
> case we are really out of memory. Order-0 requests are much more common
> and so a risk of a livelock without any way forward is highly unlikely.
>
> Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index a2214c64ed3c..7401e996009a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3161,6 +3161,16 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned int order, int alloc_fla
> if (!order || order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> return false;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
> + /*
> + * This is a gross workaround to compensate a lack of reliable compaction
> + * operation. We cannot simply go OOM with the current state of the compaction
> + * code because this can lead to pre mature OOM declaration.
> + */
> + if (order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> + return true;
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * There are setups with compaction disabled which would prefer to loop
> * inside the allocator rather than hit the oom killer prematurely.
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20161121154336.GD19750@merlins.org>
2016-11-21 21:50 ` 4.8.8 kernel trigger OOM killer repeatedly when I have lots of RAM that should be free Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-21 21:56 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-21 23:03 ` [PATCH] block,blkcg: use __GFP_NOWARN for best-effort allocations in blkcg Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 15:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-22 16:48 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-22 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-23 8:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-28 17:19 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 7:25 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29 16:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 17:13 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-29 17:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-22 16:00 ` Jens Axboe
2016-11-22 16:06 ` 4.8.8 kernel trigger OOM killer repeatedly when I have lots of RAM that should be free Marc MERLIN
2016-11-22 16:14 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-22 16:25 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-22 16:47 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-22 16:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-11-29 16:25 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 16:43 ` Patch "mm, oom: stop pre-mature high-order OOM killer invocations" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree gregkh
2016-11-29 16:43 ` 4.8.8 kernel trigger OOM killer repeatedly when I have lots of RAM that should be free Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-11-22 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-23 6:34 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-23 6:53 ` Hillf Danton
2016-11-23 7:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-23 9:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-28 7:23 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-11-28 20:55 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-29 15:55 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-29 16:07 ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-29 16:34 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-29 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-29 17:40 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-29 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-30 17:47 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-30 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-11-30 18:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-30 18:27 ` Jens Axboe
2016-11-30 20:30 ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-01 13:50 ` Kent Overstreet
2016-12-01 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-01 18:30 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-01 18:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-01 18:46 ` Jens Axboe
2016-11-29 23:01 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-30 13:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-02 4:12 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-02 7:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-02 14:15 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-02 10:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-11-29 16:15 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-22 21:46 ` Simon Kirby
2016-11-28 8:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161128072315.GC14788@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox