public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
Subject: [patch] Documentation/process/howto: Only send regression fixes after -rc1
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:43:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161128144315.GA15885@mwanda> (raw)

The original text was not clear if white space or other harmless patches
should be merged in -rc kernels.  The discussion at Kernel Summit said
that we should be more strict about sending regression fixes only.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/Documentation/process/howto.rst b/Documentation/process/howto.rst
index 449ca1f1..1260f60 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/howto.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/howto.rst
@@ -267,15 +267,16 @@ process is as follows:
     is using git (the kernel's source management tool, more information
     can be found at https://git-scm.com/) but plain patches are also just
     fine.
-  - After two weeks a -rc1 kernel is released it is now possible to push
-    only patches that do not include new features that could affect the
-    stability of the whole kernel.  Please note that a whole new driver
-    (or filesystem) might be accepted after -rc1 because there is no
-    risk of causing regressions with such a change as long as the change
-    is self-contained and does not affect areas outside of the code that
-    is being added.  git can be used to send patches to Linus after -rc1
-    is released, but the patches need to also be sent to a public
-    mailing list for review.
+  - After two weeks a -rc1 kernel is released and the focus is on making the
+    new kernel as rock solid as possible.  Most of the patches at this point
+    should fix a regression.  Bugs that have always existed are not
+    regressions, so only push these kinds of fixes if they are important.
+    Please note that a whole new driver (or filesystem) might be accepted
+    after -rc1 because there is no risk of causing regressions with such a
+    change as long as the change is self-contained and does not affect areas
+    outside of the code that is being added.  git can be used to send
+    patches to Linus after -rc1 is released, but the patches need to also be
+    sent to a public mailing list for review.
   - A new -rc is released whenever Linus deems the current git tree to
     be in a reasonably sane state adequate for testing.  The goal is to
     release a new -rc kernel every week.

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-28 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-28 14:43 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2016-11-28 15:45 ` [patch] Documentation/process/howto: Only send regression fixes after -rc1 Greg KH
2016-11-29  0:25 ` Jonathan Corbet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161128144315.GA15885@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox