From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@corsac.net>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] firmware: refactor loading status
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 23:34:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161128223408.GF1402@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479376851-2307-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:00:47AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
>
> Hi,
>
> after the lengthy discussion online and in person I decided to remove
> all things which might change behavoir. So this is refactore clean up
> version. I think it worth to consider it because this version gets rid
> of the fw_lock dependency for protecting the loading status.
>
> It is based on Yves-Alexis' patch "firmware: fix usermode helper
> fallback loading". According this patch I fixed the type cast
> error in __fw_state_wait_common(). This function returns a long
> now.
>
> The last patch could be merged into second last. I decided to
> split it to make the review easier.
Thanks for all this work and your patience during review!
Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Luis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-17 10:00 [PATCH v7 0/4] firmware: refactor loading status Daniel Wagner
2016-11-17 10:00 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] " Daniel Wagner
2016-11-17 10:00 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] firmware: drop bit ops in favor of simple state machine Daniel Wagner
2016-11-17 10:00 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] firmware: do not use fw_lock for fw_state protection Daniel Wagner
2016-11-17 10:00 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] firmware: move fw_state_is_done() into UHM section Daniel Wagner
2016-11-28 22:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161128223408.GF1402@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=corsac@corsac.net \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).