From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932234AbcK2Th5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:37:57 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37286 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755265AbcK2Thw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:37:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:37:50 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Serge Semin Cc: srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, andrew@lunn.ch, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, Sergey.Semin@t-platforms.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] eeprom: Add IDT 89HPESx EEPROM/CSR driver Message-ID: <20161129193750.GD20341@kroah.com> References: <1475450025-29507-1-git-send-email-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <1480372701-30560-1-git-send-email-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <1480372701-30560-2-git-send-email-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1480372701-30560-2-git-send-email-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:38:20AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > +struct idt_89hpesx_dev { > + u32 eesize; > + bool eero; > + u8 eeaddr; > + > + u8 inieecmd; > + u8 inicsrcmd; > + u8 iniccode; > + > + atomic_t csr; > + > + int (*smb_write)(struct idt_89hpesx_dev *, const struct idt_smb_seq *); > + int (*smb_read)(struct idt_89hpesx_dev *, struct idt_smb_seq *); > + struct mutex smb_mtx; > + > + struct i2c_client *client; > + > + struct bin_attribute *ee_file; > + struct dentry *csr_dir; > + struct dentry *csr_file; > +}; > +#define to_pdev_kobj(__kobj) \ > + dev_get_drvdata(container_of(__kobj, struct device, kobj)) Is it a struct device, or a kobject? This is totally confusing to me. And can't you just use kobj_to_dev()? > +/* > + * eeprom_attribute - EEPROM sysfs-node attributes > + * > + * NOTE Size will be changed in compliance with OF node. EEPROM attribute will > + * be read-only as well if the corresponding flag is specified in OF node. > + */ > +BIN_ATTR(eeprom, 0644, idt_sysfs_eeprom_read, idt_sysfs_eeprom_write, > + EEPROM_DEF_SIZE); static? And BIN_ATTR_RW()? thanks, greg k-h