From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754468AbcK2XbJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:31:09 -0500 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:44576 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751537AbcK2XbI (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:31:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:30:21 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "David S. Miller" , Marcin Wojtas , Vladimir Zapolskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: sram: remove useless #ifdef Message-ID: <20161129233021.2o7hm7cp3abca5sc@piout.net> References: <20161122143103.1835294-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20161129194154.GA27810@kroah.com> <20161129195400.zzeubppc2gwris4e@piout.net> <20161129200153.GA11625@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161129200153.GA11625@kroah.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161104 (1.7.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/11/2016 at 21:01:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote : > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:54:00PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 29/11/2016 at 20:41:54 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote : > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 03:30:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > A recent patch added a new function that is now unused whenever > > > > CONFIG_OF is disabled: > > > > > > > > drivers/misc/sram.c:342:12: error: 'atmel_securam_wait' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] > > > > > > > > There is actually no reason for the #ifdef, because the driver > > > > currently cannot be used in a meaningful way without CONFIG_OF, > > > > and there is no compile-time dependency. > > > > > > > > Removing that #ifdef and the respective of_match_ptr() avoids the > > > > warning and simplifies the driver slightly. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 2ae2e28852f2 ("misc: sram: add Atmel securam support") > > > > > > What tree is this commit in? I can't seem to find it in one of mine, am > > > I just missing it somewhere? > > > > > > > It is in arm-soc (it went through the mach-at91 tree) > > Ah, ok, nothing I can do about it then, nice! Yeah, I was thinking Arnd would take it directly. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com