public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@brocade.com>,
	"M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com>,
	Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:03:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161208110331.GK3107@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612081001230.3400@nanos>

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:04:25AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -289,16 +293,17 @@ int topology_update_package_map(unsigned
>  	if (test_and_set_bit(pkg, physical_package_map))
>  		goto found;
>  
> -	if (logical_packages_frozen) {
> -		physical_to_logical_pkg[pkg] = -1;
> -		pr_warn("APIC(%x) Package %u exceeds logical package max\n",
> -			apicid, pkg);
> +	if (logical_packages >= __max_logical_packages) {
> +		pr_warn("Package %u of CPU %u exceeds BIOS package data %u.\n",
> +			logical_packages, cpu, __max_logical_packages);
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  	}
>  
>  	new = logical_packages++;
> -	pr_info("APIC(%x) Converting physical %u to logical package %u\n",
> -		apicid, pkg, new);
> +	if (new != pkg) {
> +		pr_info("CPU %u Converting physical %u to logical package %u\n",
> +			cpu, pkg, new);
> +	}

This makes the print conditional on the phy<->logical mapping not
matching; I thought it was a concious decision to print everything in
the initial version.

This way, if we have a 4 node system and nodes 1,2 are crossed we'll
only see:

 "Converting physical 2 to logical package 1"
 "Converting physical 1 to logical package 2"

And nothing on the other two nodes, which could be slightly confusing.

>  	physical_to_logical_pkg[pkg] = new;
>  
>  found:



> @@ -366,27 +371,9 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(
>  	size = BITS_TO_LONGS(max_physical_pkg_id) * sizeof(unsigned long);
>  	physical_package_map = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
> -	for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> -		unsigned int apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid(cpu);
> -
> -		if (apicid == BAD_APICID || !apic->apic_id_valid(apicid))
> -			continue;
> -		if (!topology_update_package_map(apicid, cpu))
> -			continue;
> -		pr_warn("CPU %u APICId %x disabled\n", cpu, apicid);
> -		per_cpu(x86_bios_cpu_apicid, cpu) = BAD_APICID;
> -		set_cpu_possible(cpu, false);
> -		set_cpu_present(cpu, false);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (logical_packages > __max_logical_packages) {
> -		pr_warn("Detected more packages (%u), then computed by BIOS data (%u).\n",
> -			logical_packages, __max_logical_packages);
> -		logical_packages_frozen = true;
> -		__max_logical_packages  = logical_packages;

So we'll never 'shrink' the initially computed max; which could result
in using more memory than strictly needed, otoh it makes physical
hotplug happier.

> -	}
> -
>  	pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
> +
> +	topology_update_package_map(pkg, cpu);
>  }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-08 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-08  9:04 [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more robust Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-08  9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-08 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-12-08 12:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-08 13:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-08 13:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-09 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-09 23:02   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-09 23:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-10  3:37       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-10 19:03         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-10  3:27     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-10 19:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-10 19:13         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-11  3:23           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-12 10:04             ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-12 19:07               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-13 11:16               ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-06 13:39               ` [PATCH v2] " Max Vozeler
2017-06-07  1:48                 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-06-07 12:19                   ` Max Vozeler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161208110331.GK3107@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=ciwillia@brocade.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.v.b@runbox.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox