Re: [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:

> On 05/12/16 18:49, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > This is the third pass at my patchset to fix up our problems with
> > XENMEM_machine_memory_map on large systems.  The only changes on this
> > pass were to flesh out the comment above the E820_X_MAX definition, and
> > to add Juergen's Reviewed-by to the second patch.
> > 
> > Let me know if anyone has any questions/comments!
> > 
> > Alex Thorlton (2):
> >   x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX
> >   xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
> > 
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 12 ++++++++----
> >  arch/x86/xen/setup.c        |  6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Ingo, do you have any preferences through which tree those patches
> should go? I'd like to have at least patch 2 in 4.10, so I could take
> it through the Xen tree.

Sure, both are fine to me:

  Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo