public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: flush async calls before testing driver removal
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 14:04:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161210130404.GB8145@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c1eb9e4-3e49-660a-e3c2-d048d3189a26@mleia.com>

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 02:38:41PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> 
> On 12/10/2016 09:32 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 02:15:19AM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> If CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE option is enabled a number of false
> >> positives are reported for ATA controller drivers, because ATA port
> >> probes are done asynchronously, and the same problem may also touch
> >> other asynchronously probed drivers.
> >>
> >> To reduce the rate of false reports on boot call async_synchronize_full()
> >> before attempting to remove a driver, the same is done in delete_module()
> >> syscall for all possible drivers and in __device_release_driver() function
> >> for asynchronously probed drivers.
> > 
> > __device_release_driver() already calls this function, why call it
> > again?
> > 
> 
> __device_release_driver() is not called on test removal of drivers, if
> CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE option is enabled.
> 
> This opens a possibility to races like one I've discovered:
> 
>   https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg53473.html
> 
> Next, async_synchronize_full() from __device_release_driver() is not
> called in case of removal of ATA controller drivers, because
> driver_allows_async_probing(drv) return value is false.

Hm, how does this not also get hit if you unbind/bind/unbind/bind/etc.
from userspace as well?  I don't think this is a
CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE issue, but just that this option finds
the problem corner cases as you are finding out :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-10 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-10  0:15 [PATCH] driver core: flush async calls before testing driver removal Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-12-10  1:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-12-10 12:57   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-12-10  7:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-12-10 12:38   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-12-10 13:04     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2016-12-11  1:44       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-12-12 17:50         ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-12 18:33           ` Rob Herring
2016-12-12 18:46             ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161210130404.GB8145@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox