From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752549AbcLJSO3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:14:29 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57648 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752319AbcLJSO2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:14:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:14:33 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: James Simmons Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Andreas Dilger , Oleg Drokin , Ben Evans , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lustre Development List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected by obdo move Message-ID: <20161210181433.GA8477@kroah.com> References: <1481393161-22623-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <1481393161-22623-4-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1481393161-22623-4-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 01:05:59PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > From: Ben Evans > > It was found if you sort the headers alphabetically > that it reduced patch conflicts. This patch sorts > the headers alphabetically and also place linux > header first, then uapi header and finally the > lustre kernel headers. I still don't agree, when did you last have a patch conflict with this file in the .h section? And exactly how hard was it to fix it up? I'm all for cleanups, but really, this is useless. And I said so the last time you sent it... greg k-h