From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv5 5/7] printk: report lost messages in printk safe/nmi contexts
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:58:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161212155810.GD2441@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161201135546.15549-6-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
On Thu 2016-12-01 22:55:44, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Account lost messages in pritk-safe and printk-safe-nmi
> contexts and report those numbers during printk_safe_flush().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
> @@ -211,6 +242,9 @@ static void __printk_safe_flush(struct irq_work *work)
> if (atomic_cmpxchg(&s->len, len, 0) != len)
> goto more;
>
> + report_nmi_message_lost();
> + report_safe_message_lost();
The great thing about this solution is that we print this message
in the right order (after the messages that fit into the buffer).
But not really because we report lost messages from both buffers
and from all CPUs here.
The perfect solution would be to remember the number of lost messages
in struct printk_safe_seq_buf. Then we might bump the value directly
in printk_safe_log_store() instead of returning the ugly -ENOSPC.
Also we could use an universal message (no "NMI" or "printk-safe")
because it could be printed right after flushing the messages
that fit the buffer.
This solution is good enough and still better than the previous one, so
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
But if you would want to change it to the "perfect" one, it would be
appreciated ;-) It will be even more straightforward and less code.
In this, case I would do the change in an earlier patch to make
it more straightforward. But we could also do this later
(in another patchset).
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-12 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-01 13:55 [RFC][PATCHv5 0/7] printk: use printk_safe to handle printk() recursive calls Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-01 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCHv5 1/7] printk: use vprintk_func in vprintk() Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-01 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCHv5 2/7] printk: rename nmi.c and exported api Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-01 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCHv5 3/7] printk: introduce per-cpu safe_print seq buffer Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-09 16:46 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-10 3:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-12 13:54 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-12 14:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-12 15:15 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-12 15:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-01 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCHv5 4/7] printk: always use deferred printk when flush printk_safe lines Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-12 15:20 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-01 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCHv5 5/7] printk: report lost messages in printk safe/nmi contexts Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-12 15:58 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2016-12-13 1:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-14 10:51 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-01 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCHv5 6/7] printk: use printk_safe buffers in printk Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-12 16:30 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-13 1:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-01 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCHv5 7/7] printk: remove zap_locks() function Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-12-12 16:37 ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-13 1:26 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161212155810.GD2441@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=calvinowens@fb.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox