public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/pebs: add workaround for broken OVFL status on HSW
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:55:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161214175552.GW3207@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160310104236.GV6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>


Just spotted this again, ping?

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:42:36AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:40:07AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > With your queue.tip perf/core branch, I run into another problem.
> > I am monitoring with 2 PEBS events and I have the NMI watchdog enabled.
> > 
> > I see non-EXACT PEBS records again, despite my change (which is in).
> > I tracked it down to the following issue after the testing of bit 62:
> > 
> > [31137.273061] CPU71 status=0x200000001 orig_status=0x200000001 bit62=0
> > 
> > The IRQ handler is called because the fixed counter for the NMI has overflowed
> > and it sees this in bit 33, but it also sees that one of the PEBS
> > events has also
> > overflowed, yet bit 62 is not set. Therefore both overflows are
> > treated as regular
> > and the drain_pebs() is not called generating a non-EXACT record for the PEBS
> > counter (counter 0). So something is wrong still and this is on Broadwell.
> > 
> > First, I don't understand why the OVF bit for counter 0 is set. It
> > should not according
> > to specs because the counter is in PEBS mode. There must be a race there. So we
> > have to handle it by relying on cpuc->pebs_enabled. I will try that.
> > We likely also
> > need to force OVF bit 62 to 1 so we can ack it in the end (and in case
> > it gets set).
> 
> How about we make the clear of pebs_enabled unconditional?
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 68fa55b4d42e..dc9579665425 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -1883,6 +1883,16 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	status &= ~(GLOBAL_STATUS_COND_CHG |
>  		    GLOBAL_STATUS_ASIF |
>  		    GLOBAL_STATUS_LBRS_FROZEN);
> +	/*
> +	 * There are cases where, even though, the PEBS ovfl bit is set
> +	 * in GLOBAL_OVF_STATUS, the PEBS events may also have their
> +	 * overflow bits set for their counters. We must clear them
> +	 * here because they have been processed as exact samples in
> +	 * the drain_pebs() routine. They must not be processed again
> +	 * in the for_each_bit_set() loop for regular samples below.
> +	 */
> +	status &= ~cpuc->pebs_enabled;
> +
>  	if (!status)
>  		goto done;
>  
> @@ -1892,16 +1902,6 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	if (__test_and_clear_bit(62, (unsigned long *)&status)) {
>  		handled++;
>  		x86_pmu.drain_pebs(regs);
> -		/*
> -		 * There are cases where, even though, the PEBS ovfl bit is set
> -		 * in GLOBAL_OVF_STATUS, the PEBS events may also have their
> -		 * overflow bits set for their counters. We must clear them
> -		 * here because they have been processed as exact samples in
> -		 * the drain_pebs() routine. They must not be processed again
> -		 * in the for_each_bit_set() loop for regular samples below.
> -		 */
> -		status &= ~cpuc->pebs_enabled;
> -		status &= x86_pmu.intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-14 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-03 19:50 [PATCH 0/3] perf/x86/pebs: various important fixes for PEBS Stephane Eranian
2016-03-03 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel: add definition for PT PMI bit Stephane Eranian
2016-03-08 13:16   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Add " tip-bot for Stephane Eranian
2016-03-03 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/pebs: add workaround for broken OVFL status on HSW Stephane Eranian
2016-03-03 21:43   ` Andi Kleen
2016-03-03 23:40     ` Stephane Eranian
2016-03-07 10:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-07 12:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-07 18:27           ` Jiri Olsa
2016-03-07 20:25             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-08 20:59               ` Stephane Eranian
2016-03-08 21:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-08 21:13                   ` Stephane Eranian
2016-03-09  5:34                     ` Stephane Eranian
2016-03-09  5:44                       ` Stephane Eranian
2016-03-09 17:40                         ` Stephane Eranian
2016-03-10 10:42                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-14 17:55                             ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-12-15  7:26                               ` Stephane Eranian
2016-12-15  7:52                                 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-12-15  8:04                                   ` Stephane Eranian
2016-12-15  8:42                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-15 16:59                                   ` Stephane Eranian
2016-12-15 17:10                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16  8:38                                       ` Stephane Eranian
2016-12-16 17:48                                         ` Stephane Eranian
2016-03-10 13:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-10 16:10             ` Stephane Eranian
2016-03-08 13:16   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/pebs: Add workaround for broken OVFL status on HSW+ tip-bot for Stephane Eranian
2016-03-03 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/pebs: add proper PEBS constraints for Broadwell Stephane Eranian
2016-03-08 13:16   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/pebs: Add " tip-bot for Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161214175552.GW3207@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox