From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754209AbcLORMR (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:12:17 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:43782 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751014AbcLORMP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:12:15 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:12:00 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Petr Mladek Cc: Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add printk maintainers Message-ID: <20161215171200.GY3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1481798878-31898-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <20161215084815.4d479755@gandalf.local.home> <20161215143443.GA1053@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161215143443.GA1053@pathway.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:34:43PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > We have to find the right balance. For example, we do not show > messages immediately in NMI context because there is a risk > of a deadlock. I find the occasional deadlock much preferable to guaranteed no output.