From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paolo.valente@linaro.org,
osandov@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:29:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161215192940.GA29747@vader.dhcp.TheFacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481779568-10642-6-git-send-email-axboe@fb.com>
Hey, Jens, a couple of minor nits below.
One bigger note: adding the blk_mq_sched_*() helpers and keeping the
blk_mq_*() helpers that they replaced seems risky. For example,
blk_mq_free_request() is superseded by blk_mq_sched_put_request(), but
we kept blk_mq_free_request(). There are definitely some codepaths that
are still using blk_mq_free_request() that are now wrong
(__nvme_submit_user_cmd() is the most obvious one I saw).
Can we get rid of the old, non-sched functions? Or maybe even make old
interface do the sched stuff instead of adding blk_mq_sched_*()?
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:26:06PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
> ---
> block/Makefile | 2 +-
> block/blk-core.c | 7 +-
> block/blk-exec.c | 3 +-
> block/blk-flush.c | 7 +-
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 375 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> block/blk-mq-sched.h | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 1 +
> block/blk-mq.c | 192 ++++++++++--------------
> block/blk-mq.h | 3 +
> block/elevator.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 3 +-
> include/linux/elevator.h | 29 ++++
> 12 files changed, 833 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 block/blk-mq-sched.c
> create mode 100644 block/blk-mq-sched.h
>
[snip]
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 8d1cec8e25d1..d10a246a3bc7 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2267,10 +2229,10 @@ static int blk_mq_queue_reinit_dead(unsigned int cpu)
> * Now CPU1 is just onlined and a request is inserted into ctx1->rq_list
> * and set bit0 in pending bitmap as ctx1->index_hw is still zero.
> *
> - * And then while running hw queue, flush_busy_ctxs() finds bit0 is set in
> - * pending bitmap and tries to retrieve requests in hctx->ctxs[0]->rq_list.
> - * But htx->ctxs[0] is a pointer to ctx0, so the request in ctx1->rq_list
> - * is ignored.
> + * And then while running hw queue, blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs() finds bit0 is set
> + * in pending bitmap and tries to retrieve requests in hctx->ctxs[0]->rq_list.
> + * But htx->ctxs[0] is a pointer to ctx0, so the request in ctx1->rq_list is
> + * ignored.
> */
This belongs in patch 4 where flush_busy_ctxs() got renamed.
> static int blk_mq_queue_reinit_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
> index e59f5ca520a2..a5ddc860b220 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> */
> void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
> bool at_head);
> +void blk_mq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
> + struct list_head *list);
> +void blk_mq_process_sw_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx);
Looks like the declaration of blk_mq_process_sw_list() survived a rebase
even though it doesn't exist anymore.
[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-15 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-15 5:26 [PATCHSET v3] blk-mq scheduling framework Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 5:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: move existing elevator ops to union Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 5:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: make mq_ops a const pointer Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-15 5:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] block: move rq_ioc() to blk.h Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 5:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: export some helpers we need to the scheduling framework Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 5:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 19:29 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2016-12-15 20:14 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 21:44 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 5:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the deadline IO scheduler Jens Axboe
2016-12-15 5:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] blk-mq-sched: allow setting of default " Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-08 20:13 [PATCHSET/RFC v2] blk-mq scheduling framework Jens Axboe
2016-12-08 20:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers Jens Axboe
2016-12-13 13:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-13 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-14 10:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-14 15:05 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-13 14:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-13 15:20 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-07 23:09 [PATCHSET/RFC] blk-mq scheduling framework Jens Axboe
2016-12-07 23:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161215192940.GA29747@vader.dhcp.TheFacebook.com \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).