From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933865AbcLPKT2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:19:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:33143 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754964AbcLPKTU (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:19:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:19:15 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Vegard Nossum , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Al Viro , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: add new mmgrab() helper Message-ID: <20161216101915.GC27758@node> References: <20161216082202.21044-1-vegard.nossum@oracle.com> <20161216095624.GR3107@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161216095624.GR3107@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:56:24AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > But I must say mmget() vs mmgrab() is a wee bit confusing. mm_count vs mm_users is not very clear too. :) -- Kirill A. Shutemov