From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1764107AbcLTTJl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:09:41 -0500
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:31594 "EHLO
        userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S934294AbcLTTIM (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:08:12 -0500
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:07:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Hammond, John" <john.hammond@intel.com>
Cc: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>,
        "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
        Vitaly Fertman <vitaly_fertman@xyratex.com>,
        "Liu, Emoly" <emoly.liu@intel.com>,
        "Faccini, Bruno" <bruno.faccini@intel.com>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers
Message-ID: <20161220190750.GO8176@mwanda>
References: <20161217010045.GA140343@beast>
 <alpine.LFD.2.20.1612191614320.25173@casper.infradead.org>
 <CAKRnqNLFM_96NK3QbeoF-zC4KTe8oc7Q-eejzPgkE==XUHrwkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161220071034.GL8176@mwanda>
 <C6D48C5819337145905EDC9DB164E69728D44FEC@fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C6D48C5819337145905EDC9DB164E69728D44FEC@fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 02:57:17PM +0000, Hammond, John wrote:
> "{ NULL }" is valid ISO C, but unfortunately "{}" is not.

In the kernel we don't care.  We use lots of GCC extensions.

regards,
dan carpenter