From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>,
Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:02:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161222130246.GA8359@builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f5b2631-f744-a5c1-55c1-82eb27d5cbd7@ti.com>
On Wed 21 Dec 19:16 PST 2016, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Sarang,
>
> On 12/15/2016 06:03 PM, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
> > The function wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread waits for asynchronous
> > firmware loading to complete successfully before calling
> > rproc_boot(). The same can be achieved by just setting
> > rproc->auto_boot flag. Change this. As a result this change
> > removes wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread and moves m3_ipc->sync_complete
> > initialization to the wkup_m3_ipc_probe().
> >
> > Other than the current usage, the firmware_loading_complete is
> > only used in rproc_del() where it's no longer needed. This
> > change is in preparation for removing firmware_loading_complete
> > completely.
>
> Based on the comments so far, I am assuming that you are dropping this
> series.
>
Following up on those comments only revealed that we have several other
similar race conditions, so I'm hoping that Sarangdhar will continue to
work on fixing those - and in this process get rid of this completion.
> In any case, this series did break our PM stack. We definitely don't
> want to auto-boot the wkup_m3_rproc device, that responsibility will
> need to stay with the wkup_m3_ipc driver.
>
Reviewing the wkup_m3 situation again I see that as we have moved the
resource table parsing to the rproc_boot() path there's no longer any
need for the wkup_m3_ipc driver to wait for the remoteproc-core-internal
completion.
If rproc_get_by_phandle() returns non-NULL it is initialized. We still
don't want to call rproc_boot() from wkup_m3_ipc_probe(), so let's keep
the wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread().
Sarangdhar, could you update the wkup_m3_ipc patch to just drop the
wait_for_completion() call?
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-22 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-16 0:03 [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-16 0:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Remove firmware_loading_complete Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-16 8:26 ` loic pallardy
2016-12-16 19:28 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-17 2:41 ` Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-22 3:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Suman Anna
2016-12-22 13:02 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2016-12-23 0:07 ` Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-23 16:55 ` Suman Anna
2016-12-23 0:01 ` Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-23 17:05 ` Suman Anna
2016-12-23 23:57 ` Suman Anna
2017-01-03 23:52 ` Sarangdhar Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161222130246.GA8359@builder \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=spjoshi@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).