linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>,
	Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:02:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161222130246.GA8359@builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f5b2631-f744-a5c1-55c1-82eb27d5cbd7@ti.com>

On Wed 21 Dec 19:16 PST 2016, Suman Anna wrote:

> Hi Sarang,
> 
> On 12/15/2016 06:03 PM, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
> > The function wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread waits for asynchronous
> > firmware loading to complete successfully before calling
> > rproc_boot(). The same can be achieved by just setting
> > rproc->auto_boot flag. Change this. As a result this change
> > removes wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread and moves m3_ipc->sync_complete
> > initialization to the wkup_m3_ipc_probe().
> > 
> > Other than the current usage, the firmware_loading_complete is
> > only used in rproc_del() where it's no longer needed.  This
> > change is in preparation for removing firmware_loading_complete
> > completely.
> 
> Based on the comments so far, I am assuming that you are dropping this
> series.
> 

Following up on those comments only revealed that we have several other
similar race conditions, so I'm hoping that Sarangdhar will continue to
work on fixing those - and in this process get rid of this completion.

> In any case, this series did break our PM stack. We definitely don't
> want to auto-boot the wkup_m3_rproc device, that responsibility will
> need to stay with the wkup_m3_ipc driver.
> 

Reviewing the wkup_m3 situation again I see that as we have moved the
resource table parsing to the rproc_boot() path there's no longer any
need for the wkup_m3_ipc driver to wait for the remoteproc-core-internal
completion.

If rproc_get_by_phandle() returns non-NULL it is initialized. We still
don't want to call rproc_boot() from wkup_m3_ipc_probe(), so let's keep
the wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread().

Sarangdhar, could you update the wkup_m3_ipc patch to just drop the
wait_for_completion() call?

Regards,
Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-22 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-16  0:03 [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-16  0:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Remove firmware_loading_complete Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-16  8:26   ` loic pallardy
2016-12-16 19:28     ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-17  2:41       ` Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-22  3:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Suman Anna
2016-12-22 13:02   ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2016-12-23  0:07     ` Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-23 16:55       ` Suman Anna
2016-12-23  0:01   ` Sarangdhar Joshi
2016-12-23 17:05     ` Suman Anna
2016-12-23 23:57       ` Suman Anna
2017-01-03 23:52         ` Sarangdhar Joshi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161222130246.GA8359@builder \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=spjoshi@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).