From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, david@sigma-star.at,
tytso@mit.edu, dedekind1@gmail.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ubifs: Use 64bit readdir cookies
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:15:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161229161534.GA29261@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe46ea3c-ef8f-40ba-f4ab-8dfe8faafb0b@nod.at>
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 04:49:54PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On 29.12.2016 16:34, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >> That way UBIFS can provide a 64bit readdir() cookie which is required for NFS3.
> >
> > Sounds good. And if a matching entry isn't found (as in the case of a
> > concurrent unlink), what happens? The answer must be the same as for
> > ext4, but I've forgotten the details.... I guess it must find the next
> > highest cookie (thinking of the cookie as a 64-bit integer of some kind)
> > that exists in the directory. And that must be the same order that
> > readdir normally returns entries in.
>
> If a 64bit cookie is not found, the lookup function returns -ENOENT.
> In UBIFS we cannot just select a higher or lower key (cookie in this case),
> since it is the B-tree key and would point to a completely different
> entry.
>
> So, in case of a concurrent unlink() one would succeed and one fail with
> -ENOENT. Unless I miss something that seems okay to me.
Unlink takes (parent directory, name), not a directory cookie.
The problem is concurrent unlink and nfs readdir. So:
NFS server returns readdir result with cookie X
Somebody unlinks the entry at X.
NFS server gets readdir request with cookie X.
Then the NFS client will get a spurious -ENOENT.
I'm not sure how best to reproduce that.... Maybe:
Create a directory on an nfs-exported filesystem with lots of
entries.
Start a loop (or loops?) renaming directory entries within the
directory as fast as possible (or deleting and creating entries;
I assume it's the same thing for our purposes).
read the directory from an nfs client.
I'm not sure how many entries is "lots".... Ideally you want a single
read of the directory to require the client to make lots of READDIR
requests to the server. You could help by running:
echo 1024 >/proc/fs/nfsd/max_block_size
before starting knfsd. That should force it to return no more than 1K
of data in each READDIR reply.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-29 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-01 22:02 [PATCH 0/6] UBIFS NFS export support Richard Weinberger
2016-12-01 22:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Move is_32bit_api() to generic code Richard Weinberger
2016-12-12 22:18 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-12-12 22:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2016-12-01 22:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] ubifs: Provide a custom llseek for directories Richard Weinberger
2016-12-01 22:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] ubifs: Use 64bit readdir cookies Richard Weinberger
2016-12-29 2:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-12-29 9:19 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-12-29 15:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-12-29 15:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-12-29 16:15 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2016-12-29 16:36 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-12-29 16:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-12-29 17:05 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-01-03 19:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-12-01 22:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] ubifs: Maintain a parent pointer Richard Weinberger
2016-12-02 9:28 ` Marcus Folkesson
2016-12-02 10:36 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-04-28 8:31 ` Hyunchul Lee
2017-04-28 9:09 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-12-01 22:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] ubifs: Implement export_operations Richard Weinberger
2016-12-01 22:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] ubifs: Wire up NFS support Richard Weinberger
2016-12-29 2:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-12-29 8:48 ` Richard Weinberger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-21 20:20 [PATCH 0/6] UBIFS NFS export support v2 Richard Weinberger
2017-05-21 20:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] ubifs: Use 64bit readdir cookies Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161229161534.GA29261@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@sigma-star.at \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).