From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S966278AbdADRqJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:46:09 -0500
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:43047 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753004AbdADRop (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:44:45 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:42:48 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: dts: armada-388-clearfog: Utilize new DSA
 binding
Message-ID: <20170104174248.GG5517@lunn.ch>
References: <20170102022249.10657-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <20170102022249.10657-4-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <87shoyeo2j.fsf@free-electrons.com>
 <5a40436a-ebad-8a94-c5c5-546ba33ba545@gmail.com>
 <87fuky7mjt.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87fuky7mjt.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> That makes me think that we should either remove, or use different
> values for the version described in net/dsa/dsa.c:
> 
>     char dsa_driver_version[] = "0.1";
> 
> Today this is absolutely useless and erroneous.

I think it has been useless for over 9 years.

Feel free to remove it.

     Andrew