From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968614AbdAEIvO (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 03:51:14 -0500 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:52665 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965000AbdAEIuu (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 03:50:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:50:35 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Thierry Reding , Sascha Hauer , Stefan Agner , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Bhuvanchandra DV , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lothar Wassmann , kernel@pengutronix.de, Fabio Estevam , Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for i.MX PWMv2 Message-ID: <20170105095035.2f1fe6db@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1483573014-13185-8-git-send-email-lukma@denx.de> References: <1483573014-13185-1-git-send-email-lukma@denx.de> <1483573014-13185-8-git-send-email-lukma@denx.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 00:36:50 +0100 Lukasz Majewski wrote: > This commit provides apply() callback implementation for i.MX's PWMv2. > > Suggested-by: Stefan Agner > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon > --- > Changes for v4: > - Avoid recalculation of PWM parameters when disabling PWM signal > - Unconditionally call clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per) and > clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per) I don't see that one, but I'm not sure this is actually needed. In the enabled path we enable the clk before accessing the registers, and in the disable path, assuming you change the code according to my suggestion, the clk should already be enabled when you write to MX3_PWMCR. > > Changes for v3: > - Remove ipg clock enable/disable functions > > Changes for v2: > - None > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > index 60cdc5c..134dd66 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > @@ -249,6 +249,72 @@ static int imx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, > return ret; > } > > +static int imx_pwm_apply_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > + struct pwm_state *state) > +{ > + unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale; > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); > + struct pwm_state cstate; > + unsigned long long c; > + int ret; > + > + pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate); > + > + if (state->enabled) { > + c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per); > + c *= state->period; > + > + do_div(c, 1000000000); > + period_cycles = c; > + > + prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1; > + > + period_cycles /= prescale; > + c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles * state->duty_cycle; > + do_div(c, state->period); > + duty_cycles = c; > + > + /* > + * according to imx pwm RM, the real period value should be > + * PERIOD value in PWMPR plus 2. > + */ > + if (period_cycles > 2) > + period_cycles -= 2; > + else > + period_cycles = 0; > + Starting here... > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* > + * Wait for a free FIFO slot if the PWM is already enabled, and > + * flush the FIFO if the PWM was disabled and is about to be > + * enabled. > + */ > + if (cstate.enabled) > + imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(chip, pwm); > + else if (state->enabled) > + imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip); ... till here, should be replaced by: /* * Wait for a free FIFO slot if the PWM is already enabled, and * flush the FIFO if the PWM was disabled and is about to be * enabled. */ if (cstate.enabled) { imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(chip, pwm); } else { ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per); if (ret) return ret; imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip); } Otherwise you keep incrementing the prepare/enable counters of the clk when you change the config of an already enabled PWM. > + > + writel(duty_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMSAR); > + writel(period_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMPR); > + > + writel(MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(prescale) | > + MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN | MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN | > + MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN | MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH | > + MX3_PWMCR_EN, > + imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); > + > + } else { } else if (cstate.enabled) { Again, this is to avoid unbalanced prepare/enable counters on the per clk if the PWM config is changed several times when the PWM is disabled. > + writel(0, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); > + > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int imx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > { > struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); > @@ -280,6 +346,7 @@ static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = { > }; > > static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = { > + .apply = imx_pwm_apply_v2, > .enable = imx_pwm_enable, > .disable = imx_pwm_disable, > .config = imx_pwm_config,