From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936230AbdAEUwS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:52:18 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:43302 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182AbdAEUwK (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:52:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:24:21 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada , Thomas Gleixner , Jiri Olsa , Dave Hansen , davidcc@google.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , kan.liang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Anvin , Borislav Petkov , Paul Turner , Alexander Shishkin , Stephane Eranian , Ingo Molnar , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Set pmu->module in Intel PMU modules Message-ID: <20170105202421.GA3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1482455860-116269-1-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com> <20170105155221.GA3107@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:46:30AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > The first time I saw this I thought about doing something like the > > below, but never got around to testing if that works and subsequently > > forgot about things again. > > > > Does this make sense and or work? > > I'd argue against it. Fair enough; /me files it in the bit-bucket.