From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162791AbdAFJVd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2017 04:21:33 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34552 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162767AbdAFJTo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2017 04:19:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:19:34 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Khalid Aziz Cc: Dave Hansen , Rob Gardner , davem@davemloft.net, corbet@lwn.net, arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com, tushar.n.dave@oracle.com, sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, adam.buchbinder@gmail.com, minchan@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, keescook@chromium.org, allen.pais@oracle.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, atish.patra@oracle.com, joe@perches.com, pmladek@suse.com, jslaby@suse.cz, cmetcalf@mellanox.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, jmarchan@redhat.com, lstoakes@gmail.com, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com, vbabka@suse.cz, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, namit@vmware.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Khalid Aziz Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI) Message-ID: <20170106091934.GF5556@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <8612e7db-97c5-f757-0aae-24c3acedbc29@oracle.com> <2c0502d0-20ef-44ac-db5b-7f651a70b978@linux.intel.com> <5a0270ea-b29a-0751-a27f-2412a8588561@oracle.com> <7532a1d6-6562-b10b-dacd-931cb2a9e536@linux.intel.com> <92d55a69-b400-8461-53a1-d505de089700@oracle.com> <75c31c99-cff7-72dc-f593-012fe5acd405@linux.intel.com> <7fbc4ca1-22ef-8ef5-5c1b-dd075852e512@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7fbc4ca1-22ef-8ef5-5c1b-dd075852e512@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 05-01-17 13:30:10, Khalid Aziz wrote: [...] > It is very tempting to restrict tags to PAGE_SIZE granularity since it makes > code noticeably simpler and that is indeed going to be the majority of > cases. Sooner or later somebody would want to use multiple tags per page > though. I didn't get to read the patch throughly yet but I am really confused by this statement. The api is mprotect based which makes it ineherently PAGE_SIZE granular. How do you want to achieve cache line granularity with this API? And I would really vote for simplicity first... Subpage granularity sounds way too tricky... -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs