From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S969816AbdAFJ2Q (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 6 Jan 2017 04:28:16 -0500
Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:36654 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S939847AbdAFJ1I (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 6 Jan 2017 04:27:08 -0500
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:57:02 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] PM / Domains: Introduce domain-performance-states
 binding
Message-ID: <20170106092702.GH21926@vireshk-i7>
References: <cover.1481539827.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <dd95df02a1c3efd00bd4890f8aceeb717ad38788.1481539827.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <586F596C.7000807@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <586F596C.7000807@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 06-01-17, 14:16, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> 
> On 12/12/2016 04:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of
> > their Power Domains. The performance levels are represented by positive
> > integer values, a lower value represents lower performance state.
> > 
> > The power-domains until now were only concentrating on the idle state
> > management of the device and this needs to change in order to reuse the
> > infrastructure of power domains for active state management.
> > 
> > This patch adds binding to describe the performance states of a power
> > domain.
> 
> The bindings would also need to take into account the fact that a device
> could (and is quite often the case with qcom platforms) have 2 separate
> powerdomains, one for idle state management and another to manage active
> states. I guess the below bindings assume that there's just one.

I have answered a similar question here..

https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148067565219477&w=2

-- 
viresh