public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hv: retry infinitely on hypercall transient failures
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:42:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170107074233.GB18087@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR03MB22273BCF837FDF575D94CD0CCE620@BN3PR03MB2227.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 07:23:14AM +0000, Long Li wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 11:48 PM
> > To: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
> > Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> > <haiyangz@microsoft.com>; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hv: retry infinitely on hypercall transient failures
> > 
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:12:20PM -0800, Long Li wrote:
> > > From: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
> > >
> > > Hyper-v host guarantees that a hypercall will finish in reasonable time.
> > > Retry infinitely on transient failures to avoid returning error to upper layer.
> > 
> > Again, never retry "forever", always have a way out, otherwise you will crash.
> > 
> > And again, why are you making this change?  What problem does it solve?
> 
> The problem it tries to solve is that in this code we are returning
> error prematurely on transient failures. The hypercall is used mostly
> in channel establishment. If we return a transient failure, the VM may
> not boot or not useful after boot due to some devices missing.
> 
> Another approach is to increase the number of retries. But we don't
> know how many retries is safe, and Windows host side expects the guest
> retry infinitely and not return error on transient failures.

That implies a lot of trust in the host side, don't you think?

Worse case, make the delay a minute or so, but give the system a way out
incase there's a bug in the host.  As there will be bugs in the host,
just like there are bugs in the client :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-07  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-05  2:12 [PATCH v2] hv: retry infinitely on hypercall transient failures Long Li
2017-01-05  7:47 ` Greg KH
2017-01-07  7:23   ` Long Li
2017-01-07  7:42     ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-01-07  8:06       ` Long Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170107074233.GB18087@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox