From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86/mm/KASLR: Remap GDTs at fixed location
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:45:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170107074537.GB13565@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXgabhubUXMiTP5AgSASMkkzG+bYFaSoPt52QBZLm-PVg@mail.gmail.com>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I looked back at the fixmap, and I can see a way it could be done (using
> > NR_CPUS) like the other fixmap ranges. It would limit the number of cpus to
> > 512 (there is 2M memory left on fixmap on the default configuration). That's
> > if we never add any other fixmap on x64. I don't know if it is an acceptable
> > number and if the fixmap region could be increased. (128 if we do your kvm
> > trick, of course).
>
> IIRC we need 4096 CPUs.
On 64-bit the limit is 8192 CPUs, and the SGI guys are relying on that up to the
tune of 6144 cores already, and I'd say the 64-bit CPU count is likely to go up
further with 5-level paging.
On 32-bit the reasonable CPU limit is the number that the Intel 32-bit cluster
computing nodes use. The latest public numbers are I think 36 'tiles' with each
tile being a 2-CPU SMT core - i.e. a limit of 72 CPUs has to be maintained.
(They'll obviously go to 64-bit as well so this problem will go away in a hardware
generation or two.)
So I'd say 128 CPUs on 32-bit should be a reasonable practical limit going
forward. Right now our 32-bit limit is 512 CPUs IIRC, but I don't think any real
hardware in production is reaching that.
> P.S. Let's do the move to the fixmap, read/write as a separate patch. That will
> make bisecting much easier.
Absolutely, but this has to be within the same series, as the interim fixmap-only
step is less secure in some circumstances: we are moving the writable GDT from a
previously randomized location to a fixed location.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-07 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-04 22:16 [RFC] x86/mm/KASLR: Remap GDTs at fixed location Thomas Garnier
2017-01-05 8:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-05 15:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2017-01-05 16:40 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-05 18:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2017-01-05 19:00 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-06 17:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-06 18:04 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-05 16:39 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-06 6:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-05 17:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-05 17:54 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-05 18:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-05 18:35 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-05 18:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2017-01-05 19:03 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-05 20:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-05 21:08 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-05 21:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-05 21:58 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-06 6:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-06 18:03 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-06 21:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-06 22:54 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-06 23:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-07 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-01-07 15:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-07 7:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-07 16:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-09 22:32 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-10 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-10 17:13 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-05 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-05 23:16 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-06 2:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-06 18:02 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-01-06 21:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-07 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-06 6:45 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170107074537.GB13565@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).