From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1033030AbdAJMlG (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:41:06 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51640 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936736AbdAJMlF (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:41:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:41:05 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Laura Abbott , Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Potapenko , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Marek Szyprowski , Lorenzo Pieralisi , x86@kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Ingo Molnar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, David Vrabel , Kees Cook , Marc Zyngier , Andrey Ryabinin , Boris Ostrovsky , Andrew Morton , Dmitry Vyukov , Juergen Gross , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biederman , Joonsoo Kim , Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 00/11] CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL for arm64 Message-ID: <20170110124105.GH21598@arm.com> References: <1483464113-1587-1-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com> <20170104114449.GA18193@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:30:50PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 01/04/2017 03:44 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:25:53PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > >> On 01/03/2017 02:56 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> On 01/03/2017 09:21 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: > >>>> Happy New Year! > >>>> > >>>> This is a very minor rebase from v5. It only moves a few headers around. > >>>> I think this series should be ready to be queued up for 4.11. > >>> > >>> FWIW: > >>> > >>> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli > >>> > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >>> How do we get this series included? I would like to get the ARM 32-bit > >>> counterpart included as well (will resubmit rebased shortly), but I have > >>> no clue which tree this should be going through. > >>> > >> > >> I was assuming this would go through the arm64 tree unless Catalin/Will > >> have an objection to that. > > > > Yup, I was planning to pick it up for 4.11. > > > > Florian -- does your series depend on this? If so, then I'll need to > > co-ordinate with Russell (probably via a shared branch that we both pull) > > if you're aiming for 4.11 too. > > Yes, pretty much everything in Laura's patch series is relevant, except > the arm64 bits. Ok, then. Laura -- could you please reorder your patches so that the non-arm64 bits come first? That way, I can put those on a separate branch and have it pulled by both arm64 and rmk, so that the prequisities are shared between the architectures. Thanks, Will