Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003

Mark Rutland
2017-01-11T18:46:58Z

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:40:42PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 01/11/2017 12:37 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >The name, as it is, is perfectly descriptive.
> >
> >Let's not sacrifice legibility over a non-issue.
>
> I don't want to kick a dead horse or anything, but changing it to
> QCOM_FLKR_ERRATUM_1003 would eliminate all the spacing problems
> without sacrificing anything.

The CPU is called "Falkor", not "FLKR", and we're not coming up with an
ACPI table name...

The ARM Ltd. erratum numbers are global to all parts, so we don't
include the part name. Is the 1003 erratum number specific to Falkor?

If it's global, you could use QCOM_ERRATUM_1003 instead.

Otherwise, QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_1003 is preferable.

Thanks,
Mark.