From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Alan J. Wylie" <alan@wylie.me.uk>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.9.0 regression in pipe-backed iov_iter with systemd-nspawn
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 23:27:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112232719.GE1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyy8psMaO-wfKFBLy-icAxZyQ8DZqO5kwsPnWHPe_Z6xw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:14:41PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the callers of "do_splice_to()", we already have the
> > wait_for_space() in do_splice(), but we do *not* have it in the
> > do_splice_from() case when both the input and output file descriptors
> > are pipes.
>
> Bah. That case doesn't even trigger the new code. I was lazy with my
> grep. The two cases are "do_splice()" (which does have the
> wait-for-space) and splice_direct_to_actor(). And
> splice_direct_to_actor() shouldn't even need it, should it?
>
> So ignore that. But I think there is something about the EAGAIN.
It might, but I would really like to see where has that EAGAIN come
from. I see several possibilities:
* wait_for_space() with SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK in flags. Shouldn't
happen with 0 in the last argument of splice(2).
* default_file_splice_read() seeing pipe->nrbufs == pipe->buffers.
Shouldn't be possible after successful wait_for_space().
* vfs_readv() returning -EAGAIN. That might be possible,
actually - the damn thing has come from
13761 open("/dev/ptmx", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK|O_CLOEXEC) = 5
and O_NONBLOCK had been present in open flags.
What I'd like to see is strace of the same thing on the working kernel,
ideally - just prior to the commit bisect has converged to.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-12 20:26 4.9.0 regression in pipe-backed iov_iter with systemd-nspawn Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-12 20:31 ` Al Viro
2017-01-12 20:38 ` Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-12 22:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-12 22:37 ` Al Viro
2017-01-12 22:46 ` Al Viro
2017-01-12 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-12 23:14 ` Al Viro
2017-01-12 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-12 23:27 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-01-12 22:46 ` Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-12 22:58 ` Al Viro
2017-01-12 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-13 4:00 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 7:38 ` Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-13 7:23 ` Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-13 9:33 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 9:54 ` Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-13 10:20 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 10:32 ` Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-13 11:25 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 11:18 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-13 20:08 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 20:11 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-13 20:47 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 21:55 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 21:59 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 22:13 ` Al Viro
2017-01-13 22:50 ` Al Viro
2017-01-14 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-14 1:24 ` Al Viro
2017-01-14 1:43 ` Al Viro
2017-01-14 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-14 1:57 ` Al Viro
2017-01-15 0:53 ` Al Viro
2017-01-14 13:16 ` Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-14 16:29 ` Alan J. Wylie
2017-01-14 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-13 20:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-13 20:16 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112232719.GE1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=alan@wylie.me.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox