linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] srcu: Force full grace-period ordering
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:35:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170114093550.GB14970@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484385601-23379-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> If a process invokes synchronize_srcu(), is delayed just the right amount
> of time, and thus does not sleep when waiting for the grace period to
> complete, there is no ordering between the end of the grace period and
> the code following the synchronize_srcu().  Similarly, there can be a
> lack of ordering between the end of the SRCU grace period and callback
> invocation.
> 
> This commit adds the necessary ordering.
> 
> Reported-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>  kernel/rcu/srcu.c        |  5 +++++
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h        | 12 ------------
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 01f71e1d2e94..608d56f908f2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -1161,5 +1161,17 @@ do { \
>  		ftrace_dump(oops_dump_mode); \
>  } while (0)
>  
> +/*
> + * Place this after a lock-acquisition primitive to guarantee that
> + * an UNLOCK+LOCK pair act as a full barrier.  This guarantee applies
> + * if the UNLOCK and LOCK are executed by the same CPU or if the
> + * UNLOCK and LOCK operate on the same lock variable.

minor typo:

  s/an UNLOCK+LOCK pair act as
    an UNLOCK+LOCK pair acts as

> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
> +#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()	smp_mb()  /* Full ordering for lock. */
> +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
> +#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()	do { } while (0)
> +#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */

Yeah, so I realize that this was pre-existing code, but putting CONFIG_$ARCH
#ifdefs into generic headers is generally frowned upon.

The canonical approach would be either to define a helper Kconfig variable that 
can be set by PPC (but other architectures don't need to set it), or to expose a 
suitable macro (function) for architectures to define in their barrier.h arch 
header file.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-14  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-14  9:19 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] SRCU updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  9:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] srcu: More efficient reader counts Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  9:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-14 19:48     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  9:20 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] srcu: Force full grace-period ordering Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  9:35   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-01-14 19:54     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 21:41       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-15  7:11         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-15  7:40           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-15  7:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-15  9:24               ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-15  9:40                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-15 19:45                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16  6:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-23  8:12         ` Michael Ellerman
2017-01-24  2:45           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-15  6:54       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-14  9:20 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcutorture: Add CBMC-based formal verification for SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-15 22:41 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu v2 0/3] SRCU updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-15 22:42   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 1/3] srcu: Implement more-efficient reader counts Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-23 20:17     ` Lance Roy
2017-01-23 20:17       ` [PATCH] SRCU: More efficient " Lance Roy
2017-01-23 20:35         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-23 21:33           ` Lance Roy
2017-01-23 21:35             ` [PATCH] srcu: Implement more-efficient " Lance Roy
2017-01-24  0:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24  0:53                 ` Lance Roy
2017-01-24  1:57                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24  3:26                     ` Lance Roy
2017-01-24 17:07                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-15 22:42   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 2/3] srcu: Force full grace-period ordering Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-23  8:38     ` Lance Roy
2017-01-23 19:12       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-23 20:06         ` Lance Roy
2017-01-15 22:42   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcutorture: Add CBMC-based formal verification for SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 22:00   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/4] SRCU updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 22:00     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/4] srcu: Implement more-efficient reader counts Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-25 18:17       ` Lance Roy
2017-01-25 21:03         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 22:00     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 2/4] srcu: Force full grace-period ordering Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 22:00     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/4] rcutorture: Add CBMC-based formal verification for SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 22:00     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 4/4] srcu: Reduce probability of SRCU ->unlock_count[] counter overflow Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170114093550.GB14970@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).