The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 23:39:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170116073951.ipupoxcjnv42dwop@x> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484384085-19444-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:54:40AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This commit is the first step towards full abstraction of all accesses to
> the ->dynticks counter, implementing the previously open-coded atomic add
> of two in a new rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle() function.  This abstraction
> will ease changes to the ->dynticks counter operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This change has an additional effect not documented in the commit
message: it eliminates the smp_mb__before_atomic and
smp_mb__after_atomic calls.  Can you please document that in the commit
message, and explain why that doesn't cause a problem?

> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,19 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_dynticks, rcu_dynticks) = {
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Do a double-increment of the ->dynticks counter to emulate a
> + * momentary idle-CPU quiescent state.
> + */
> +static void rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle(void)
> +{
> +	struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> +	int special = atomic_add_return(2, &rdtp->dynticks);
> +
> +	/* It is illegal to call this from idle state. */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(special & 0x1));
> +}
> +
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(unsigned long, rcu_qs_ctr);
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_qs_ctr);
>  
> @@ -300,7 +313,6 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_qs_ctr);
>  static void rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(void)
>  {
>  	struct rcu_data *rdp;
> -	struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp;
>  	int resched_mask;
>  	struct rcu_state *rsp;
>  
> @@ -327,10 +339,7 @@ static void rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(void)
>  		 * quiescent state, with no need for this CPU to do anything
>  		 * further.
>  		 */
> -		rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> -		smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* Earlier stuff before QS. */
> -		atomic_add(2, &rdtp->dynticks);  /* QS. */
> -		smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* Later stuff after QS. */
> +		rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle();
>  		break;
>  	}
>  }
> -- 
> 2.5.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-14  8:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16  7:39   ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2017-01-16 11:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 18:57       ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 23:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16  7:47   ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:34     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 19:25       ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-17  0:12         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 16:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-16 21:01     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-17  0:06       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14  8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16  7:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Josh Triplett
2017-01-18  2:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-21 20:49     ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-23 19:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18  2:45   ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46     ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170116073951.ipupoxcjnv42dwop@x \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox