From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 03:22:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170116112239.GL5238@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170116073951.ipupoxcjnv42dwop@x>
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:39:51PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:54:40AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > This commit is the first step towards full abstraction of all accesses to
> > the ->dynticks counter, implementing the previously open-coded atomic add
> > of two in a new rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle() function. This abstraction
> > will ease changes to the ->dynticks counter operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This change has an additional effect not documented in the commit
> message: it eliminates the smp_mb__before_atomic and
> smp_mb__after_atomic calls. Can you please document that in the commit
> message, and explain why that doesn't cause a problem?
The trick is that the old code used the non-value-returning atomic_add(),
which does not imply ordering, hence the smp_mb__before_atomic() and
smp_mb__after_atomic() calls. The new code uses atomic_add_return(),
which does return a value, and therefore implies full ordering in and
of itself.
How would you like me to proceed?
Thanx, Paul
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -281,6 +281,19 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_dynticks, rcu_dynticks) = {
> > #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Do a double-increment of the ->dynticks counter to emulate a
> > + * momentary idle-CPU quiescent state.
> > + */
> > +static void rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle(void)
> > +{
> > + struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > + int special = atomic_add_return(2, &rdtp->dynticks);
> > +
> > + /* It is illegal to call this from idle state. */
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(special & 0x1));
> > +}
> > +
> > DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(unsigned long, rcu_qs_ctr);
> > EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_qs_ctr);
> >
> > @@ -300,7 +313,6 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_qs_ctr);
> > static void rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(void)
> > {
> > struct rcu_data *rdp;
> > - struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp;
> > int resched_mask;
> > struct rcu_state *rsp;
> >
> > @@ -327,10 +339,7 @@ static void rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(void)
> > * quiescent state, with no need for this CPU to do anything
> > * further.
> > */
> > - rdtp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks);
> > - smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* Earlier stuff before QS. */
> > - atomic_add(2, &rdtp->dynticks); /* QS. */
> > - smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* Later stuff after QS. */
> > + rcu_dynticks_momentary_idle();
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.5.2
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-14 8:54 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:39 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:22 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-01-16 18:57 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 23:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:47 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-16 11:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 19:25 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-17 0:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-16 21:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-17 0:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-14 8:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-16 7:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Josh Triplett
2017-01-18 2:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-21 20:49 ` Josh Triplett
2017-01-23 19:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-18 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/6] Dynticks updates for 4.11 Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks momentary-idle operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Abstract the dynticks snapshot operation Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Abstract dynticks extended quiescent state enter/exit operations Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Abstract extended quiescent state determination Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Check cond_resched_rcu_qs() state less often to reduce GP overhead Paul E. McKenney
2017-01-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170116112239.GL5238@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).