From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751523AbdAPQvC (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:51:02 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39496 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750862AbdAPQvB (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:51:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:51:13 +0100 From: Greg KH To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Thomas Sailer , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Johan Hovold , Alex Elder , "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , David Howells , NeilBrown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] make call_usermodehelper a bit more "safe" Message-ID: <20170116165113.GD29693@kroah.com> References: <20170116164944.GA28984@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170116164944.GA28984@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:49:44PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's a second cut at my attempt to make call_usermodehelper a bit more > "safe". It includes some patches from my previous series, and one new > one. In all, this is a much smaller patchset, with better functionality > in the end. And of course, I miscounted the patches, there are only 3 patches in this series, yet I said 0/4 in this email, sorry about that. greg k-h