linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] PTP: add kvm PTP driver
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:54:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170116165411.GA2386@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170116162653.GA32097@potion>

2017-01-16 17:26+0100, Radim Krcmar:
> 2017-01-13 15:40-0200, Marcelo Tosatti:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:56:58PM +0100, Radim Krcmar wrote:
>> > 2017-01-13 10:01-0200, Marcelo Tosatti:
>>> > +		version = pvclock_read_begin(src);
>>> > +
>>> > +		ret = kvm_hypercall2(KVM_HC_CLOCK_OFFSET,
>>> > +				     clock_off_gpa,
>>> > +				     KVM_CLOCK_OFFSET_WALLCLOCK);
>>> > +		if (ret != 0) {
>>> > +			pr_err("clock offset hypercall ret %lu\n", ret);
>>> > +			spin_unlock(&kvm_ptp_lock);
>>> > +			preempt_enable_notrace();
>>> > +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> > +		}
>>> > +
>>> > +		tspec.tv_sec = clock_off.sec;
>>> > +		tspec.tv_nsec = clock_off.nsec;
>>> > +
>>> > +		delta = rdtsc_ordered() - clock_off.tsc;
>>> > +
>>> > +		offset = pvclock_scale_delta(delta, src->tsc_to_system_mul,
>>> > +					     src->tsc_shift);
>>> > +
>>> > +	} while (pvclock_read_retry(src, version));
>>> > +
>>> > +	preempt_enable_notrace();
>>> > +
>>> > +	tspec.tv_nsec = tspec.tv_nsec + offset;
>>> > +
>>> > +	spin_unlock(&kvm_ptp_lock);
>>> > +
>>> > +	if (tspec.tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
>>> > +		u64 secs = tspec.tv_nsec;
>>> > +
>>> > +		tspec.tv_nsec = do_div(secs, NSEC_PER_SEC);
>>> > +		tspec.tv_sec += secs;
>>> > +	}
>>> > +
>>> > +	memcpy(ts, &tspec, sizeof(struct timespec64));
>>> 
>>> But the whole idea is of improving the time by reading tsc a bit later
>>> is just weird ... why is it better to provide
>>> 
>>>   tsc + x, time + tsc_delta_to_time(x)
>>> 
>>> than just
>>> 
>>>  tsc, time
>>> 
>>> ?
>> 
>> Because you want to calculate the value of the host realtime clock 
>> at the moment of ptp_kvm_gettime.
>> 
>> We do:
>> 
>> 	1. kvm_hypercall.
>> 	2. get {sec, nsec, guest_tsc}.
>> 	3. kvm_hypercall returns.
>> 	4. delay = rdtsc() - guest_tsc.
>> 
>> Where delay is the delta (measured with the TSC) between points 2 and 4.
> 
> I see now ... the PTP interface is just not good for our purposes.

There is getcrosststamp() callback in PTP, which seems to be exactly
what we want when pairing with TSC, so the pvclock delay fixup can be
dropped when using it.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-13 12:01 [patch 0/3] KVM virtual PTP driver Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 12:01 ` [patch 1/3] KVM: x86: provide realtime host clock via vsyscall notifiers Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 15:18   ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-13 15:34     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 16:28       ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-13 17:51         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-16 15:40           ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-13 15:41     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-13 15:46       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 12:01 ` [patch 2/3] KVM: x86: add KVM_HC_CLOCK_OFFSET hypercall Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 15:31   ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-13 15:43     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 17:07       ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-13 17:57         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 12:01 ` [patch 3/3] PTP: add kvm PTP driver Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 15:56   ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-13 17:40     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-16 16:26       ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-16 16:54         ` Radim Krcmar [this message]
2017-01-16 17:08           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-16 17:27             ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-16 17:39               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-16 18:01                 ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-16 19:36                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-16 19:47                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-16 20:01                       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-17  8:03                         ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-01-17 11:30                           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-17 15:36                             ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-18 12:17                               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-18 12:24                                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-18 12:46                                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-18 13:36                                     ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-01-18 14:02                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-18 14:50                                         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-18 15:35                                           ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-18 15:45                                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-18 15:57                                             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-18 14:24                                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-18 15:54                                       ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-01-18 16:07                                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-01-18 16:14                                         ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-18 14:37                                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-18 14:53                                       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-18 15:20                                         ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-18 15:28                                           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-20 14:18                                             ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-18 15:59                                     ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-16 17:04         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-16 17:46           ` Radim Krcmar
2017-01-16 19:33             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-14 15:26     ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-16 15:48       ` Radim Krcmar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-13 18:45 [patch 0/3] KVM virtual PTP driver (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2017-01-13 18:46 ` [patch 3/3] PTP: add kvm PTP driver Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170116165411.GA2386@potion \
    --to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).